MODULE 01: Lesson 01 – Is Magick Religious?

This topic contains 0 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by  Athena 1 year, 2 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #804

    Athena
    Moderator

    Really, there is no right or wrong answer to this. There are people who view their craft as a religion, others who look at it as a more cultural experience and still more who see it as an aspect of science that merely hasn’t been investigated to its full potential yet. For many magickal practitioners even the term “religion” can be somewhat of an emotional trigger, having had negative experiences, generally with monotheistic traditions, in the past.

    Many say the etymology of religion lies with the Latin word religare, which means “to tie, to bind.” This seems to be favored on the assumption that it helps explain the power religion has. The Oxford English Dictionary points out, though, that the etymology of the word is doubtful. Earlier writers like Cicero connected the term with relegere, which means “to read over again” (perhaps to emphasize the ritualistic nature of religions?).

    Some argue that religion doesn’t really exist — there is only culture. Jonathan Z. Smith writes in Imagining Religion:
    “…while there is a staggering amount of data, phenomena, of human experiences and expressions that might be characterized in one culture or another, by one criterion or another, as religion — there is no data for religion. Religion is solely the creation of the scholar’s study. It is created for the scholar’s analytic purposes by his imaginative acts of comparison and generalization. Religion has no existence apart from the academy.”

    It is true that many societies do not draw a clear line between their culture and what scholars would call “religion.” This does not mean that religion doesn’t exist, but it is worth keeping in mind that even when we think we have a handle on what religion is, we might be fooling ourselves.

    Definitions of religion tend to suffer from one of two problems: they are either too narrow and exclude many belief systems which most agree are religious, or they are too vague and ambiguous, suggesting that just about any and everything is a religion.

    A good example of a narrow definition is the common attempt to define “religion” as “belief in God,” effectively excluding polytheistic religions and atheistic religions while including theists who have no religious belief system. A good example of a vague definition is the tendency to define religion as “worldview” — but how can every worldview qualify as a religion?

    Some have argued that religion isn’t hard to define and the plethora of conflicting definitions is evidence of how easy it really is. The problem lies in finding a definition that is empirically useful and empirically testable. So far, the best definition of religion I have seen is in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. It lists traits of religions rather than declaring religion to be one thing or another, arguing that the more markers present in a belief system, the more”religious like” it is:

    * Belief in supernatural beings (gods).
    * A distinction between sacred and profane objects.
    * Ritual acts focused on sacred objects.
    * A moral code believed to be sanctioned by the gods.
    * Characteristically religious feelings (awe, sense of mystery, sense of guilt, adoration), which tend to be aroused in the presence of sacred objects and during the practice of ritual, and which are connected in idea with the gods.
    * Prayer and other forms of communication with gods.
    * A world view, or a general picture of the world as a whole and the place of the individual therein. This picture contains some specification of an over-all purpose or point of the world and an indication of how the individual fits into it.
    * A more or less total organization of one’s life based on the world view.
    * A social group bound together by the above.

    This definition captures much of what religion is across diverse cultures. It includes sociological, psychological, and historical factors and allows for broader gray areas in the concept of religion. It’s not without flaws, though. The first marker, for example, is about “supernatural beings” and gives “gods” as an example, but thereafter only gods are mentioned. Even the concept of “supernatural beings” is a bit too specific; Mircea Eliade defined religion in reference to a focus on “the sacred” and that is a good replacement for “supernatural beings” because not every religion revolves around the supernatural.

    A better definition is:

    * Ritual acts focused on sacred objects.
    * Belief in something sacred (for example, gods or other supernatural beings).
    * A distinction between sacred and profane objects.
    * A moral code believed to have a sacred or supernatural basis.
    * Characteristically religious feelings (awe, sense of mystery, sense of guilt, adoration), which tend to be aroused in the presence of sacred objects and during the practice of ritual.
    * Prayer and other forms of communication with the supernatural.
    * A world view, or a general picture of the world as a whole and the place of the individual therein. This picture contains some specification of an over-all purpose or point of the world and an indication of how the individual fits into it.
    * A more or less total organization of one’s life based on the world view.
    * A social group bound together by the above.

    DISCUSSION PROMPTS

    When looking at these definitions, are there any aspects that resonate with your current practice or that you would like to mold your practice around?

    Do you feel that magickal practice is a part of religion at all? Or something completely separate?

    What has been your personal experience with the combination of magick and religion in the past? Both things that have worked and things that have clashed terribly.

    Is there a particular religious path or magickal pantheon that you currently follow yourself? Deities that you feel aligned with? Please share with us the path you feel called to follow, or if you do not currently have one, is there a path you have always been interested in?

    ***A gentle reminder that this is a safe space for all paths. People may post things you do not agree with, and while healthy debate and discussion is definitely encouraged, mocking or attacking someone else’s beliefs will not be tolerated.***

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.